The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Review

13 05 2014


The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is the story of how Spider-Man helped Sony keep its movie rights with a decent sequel, but was ultimately defeated by ridiculously two-dimensional villains. Sure, there’s some fun to be had, since it’s always fun to see what millions of dollars of CGI can do, and there’s even a profound theme about time somewhere. Unfortunately there’s also four or so other story lines that distract and tangle up in a web of too much information. Some great examples of too much material: a completely unnecessary opening act that finally answered the question, “did Peter’s parents die in a plane crash?” (yes, they did), a completely unnecessary villain (Rhino), and a jaw-droppingly small payoff to the big mystery about Peter’s dad.

Aw. So sweet, good thing nothing happens to them.

Aw. So sweet, good thing nothing happens to them.

But hey, let’s talk about the good aspects first. First, I finally bought Andrew Garfield‘s Peter Parker. He came across as more fun and less of a jerk, and I even ended up enjoying bits of him and Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) together. Their love story was handled just as well as the original Sam Raimi trilogy (you can’t help but compare to the original films if it’s been less than 10 years). Also, there was an underlying theme about spending your time wisely that I enjoyed. There were multiple shots of clocks, Gwen spelled it out in her valedictory, and Gwen’s final scene was in a clock tower. Did you miss it? I sure did, until someone pointed it out to me. If they stayed focused on this deeper content instead of throwing in more and more plot fluff, I really believe this could have been a stronger movie. Finally on that note, Dane DeHaan‘s performance as Harry Osborn was surprisingly my favorite villain, even though they crunched into half a movie what the original trilogy developed in three. Sorry, I don’t buy that you’re “best friends” if you hung out ten years ago (at age 8!) and just reconnected for a whole 24 hours. That said, DeHaan seemed to understand his character and made the most of it.

Rhino Electro Green Goblin

Emo Harry, Doctor Manhattan, and Drunk Uncle.

Now for the bad, that is,  the other two villains. Jamie Foxx is supposed to be the film’s main villain Electro, who becomes a powerful electronic entity who can fly because he electrocuted the crap out of himself in a tub full of eels. Yes, it makes about as much sense in the movie too, and his whole origin scene seemed out of place in a movie series where they made so much effort to logically explain Goblin and the Lizard. Even more hilarious  was how frying his brains out with electric eels did several year’s of orthodontic work on his teeth, even taking out the world’s most fake looking  tooth gap. What really fizzled (ho!) was his pre-Electro acting as Max Dillon. Foxx as Max was an eye-rollingly cheesy example of over-acting that did the character no justice. I could go on to discuss how he went from Spider ultra-fan to Spider-hater in 5 seconds, but I won’t because at that point his special effects were at least awesome. His end fight scene also crackled with pretty lighting effects until its sudden K.O. and the writers swept him under the rug.

If you ever wondered what Paul Giamatti looks like tripping on bath salts, this is your answer. Paul as Aleksei Sytsevich aka Rhino basically acts like a psycho Russian caricature who’s had too much crazy vodka. It’s a cartoonish, 60’s-era performance that somehow makes Jaime Foxx’s seem subtle. Out of all three villains, Rhino’s appearance in the movie is definitely the most rushed (clocking in with 10 minutes screen time at the most), but he still somehow manages to remove any emotional payoffs from the ending with the worst buildup to the worst non-existent fight ever. As in, if you’ve seen the trailers, you’ve seen the entire Rhino robot suit battle. It simply cuts off out of shame. By the time the mid-credits X-Men trailer (I know, what?) shows up, any lasting effect from the movie’s deeper parts had largely disappeared.

Meth. Not even once.

Meth. Not even once.

Final impressions? Too much exposition and too many villains clog up an otherwise entertaining film. The Amazing Spider-Man movie series is getting better, but in my mind this was still not even as good as Spider-Man 3, because at least that bloated film had better villains and J. Jonah Jameson. On that note, here’s a clip of him laughing.

Still Missed.

Still Missed.





3 responses

13 05 2014

Didn’t hate this one like everybody else seemed to. Except for the fact that it was longer than it should have been. Good review.

13 05 2014

Ugh. Are you an employee of Sony? Second worse installment next to the amazing basketball head 1. All the villains look nothing like the source material in the worst way. Spider is my favorite character in the marvel universe yet I could not bring myself to like this movie. At least the costume looked someone better. Too many villains,and they looked terrible,too long. Knew I should have skipped this but I really wanted to like it and couldn’t resist. Just imho but my two friends hated it worse and than I did. Everything about this reboot has been a step backwards for the franchise.Bums me out.

13 05 2014

Apologies, I saw the 5 stars and kind of just skimmed the article b4 posting.Still hated it a lot but the employee crack should be directed towards the 3 voters. There were a few good spider action moments…so I give it 2 stars.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: